It might be thought that a pool with a low percentage of variable fee is more favorable to the stakers, however, it is not so. In fact, the difference in variable margin translates into a very small impact for the staker, but an equitable margin allows pool operators to invest in infrastructure, security, which is beneficial to their stakers. In fact, it is likely that a very low-margin pool will subsidize its costs through alternative revenues, or will simply spend the minimum time and effort managing its pool, which translates into a detriment to its stakers and to the Cardano network, in short. Of course, to evaluate the choice of a pool there are other variables to consider such as pledge, amount of delegation and saturation. I will use an applied example to show the impact of the variable commission. I consider a total participation of 40 million ADA and an average ROA (return on ADA) of 5.5% per year, with a fixed fee at a minimum of 340 ADA per season. The three ...
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario